{"id":1957,"date":"2026-09-15T11:09:29","date_gmt":"2026-09-15T11:09:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/?p=1957"},"modified":"2026-09-23T13:17:29","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T13:17:29","slug":"revops-strategy-how-b2b-teams-build-a-pipeline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/revops-strategy-how-b2b-teams-build-a-pipeline\/","title":{"rendered":"RevOps Strategy: How B2B Teams Build a Predictable Pipeline"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

A B2B team finishes Q3 with a pipeline miss. Not because the team did not put in the work. Because the system connecting marketing, sales, and customer success was never clearly defined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fix is not a new tool or another hire. It is a documented system that determines how pipeline gets built, managed, and measured across the full revenue cycle.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This guide covers what the system includes, what it looks like when it works, why most attempts fall short, and how to build one that creates consistent, repeatable pipeline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>What Is a RevOps Strategy?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A RevOps strategy is a documented system that aligns marketing, sales, and customer success around consistent, repeatable revenue. It covers ICP definition, data reliability, process design, execution, measurement, and feedback loops. Without all six connected, pipeline becomes unpredictable regardless of team effort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many teams treat pipeline inconsistency as a people problem. The real cause is structural. When teams operate on different lead definitions, different data, and different process expectations, the pipeline reflects that fragmentation every quarter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The goal is a system where every revenue input feeds into consistent execution. That consistency is what makes pipeline forecastable and repeatable at scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>What Does the RevOps Strategy Framework Include?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>ICP: Who Qualifies as a Target Account<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The ICP specifies company size, industry, technology used, growth signals, and buyer role. Without this precision, marketing and sales target different accounts and every downstream decision inherits that misalignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Data: How Account and Contact Records Stay Reliable<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Clean, connected data is what every component depends on. Incomplete or outdated records break prioritization and make the CRM a liability rather than a reliable system of record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Process: How Leads, Opportunities, and Handoffs Are Defined<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Process defines what happens at every transition: what qualifies a lead for sales and what moves a deal out of each stage. Without documented answers, pipeline health reflects individual rep memory rather than a shared standard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Execution: How Teams Act on Those Processes<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Execution is where defined processes become real decisions through sequences, workflows, and automation<\/a>. Without it, reps rely on judgment calls that produce inconsistent results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Measurement: How Pipeline Performance Is Tracked<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Shared metrics make execution visible across all teams. Conversion rates by stage, time in stage, and win rate by ICP tier show where the system works and where it breaks down before the quarter ends.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Feedback: How Wins and Losses Improve the System<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When deal outcomes feed back into ICP and messaging, the system sharpens each quarter. Without a feedback loop, the same targeting decisions repeat regardless of what close data shows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What separates a system that holds together from one that stalls is whether those components connect rather than operate in parallel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>What Separates RevOps Systems That Work From Those That Stall?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Five elements determine whether a revenue system holds together: shared revenue definitions, data accurate enough to target and forecast reliably, processes that make handoffs enforceable, execution that applies those processes at volume, and a feedback loop that improves the system each quarter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Strong execution without measurement creates activity without visibility. Good data without documented processes means good targeting with inconsistent follow-through.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Why Does Pipeline Break Without a Clear RevOps Strategy?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Pipeline inconsistency maps to whichever components are weak or disconnected. Five patterns are most common.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>When ICP Is Undefined, Targeting Breaks<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Different account assumptions produce an MQL-to-SQL gap that generates leads technically qualified but commercially wrong. No volume of outreach fixes a definitional mismatch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>When Data Is Disconnected, Forecasting Breaks<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

CRM records go stale, enrichment does not sync, and reps prospect from outdated lists. A connected data layer keeps records current without constant manual intervention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>When Processes Are Informal, Handoffs Break<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A qualified lead sits uncontacted because no one defined the SLA. Processes that live in memory cannot be enforced, measured, or improved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>When Metrics Diverge, Accountability Breaks<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When each team measures different things, the pipeline number shifts based on who you ask. Leadership cannot act on data that does not add up across functions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>When Feedback Is Missing, the System Cannot Improve<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When loss data does not reach the teams making targeting decisions, the same mistakes repeat. A feedback loop connects what sales learns back to marketing before the same accounts are targeted again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These are symptoms of the same underlying gap. Understanding how this compares to adjacent concepts clarifies where the fix actually belongs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Build<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How Is a RevOps Strategy Different from a RevOps Process?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The distinction matters because fixing the wrong level does not resolve the actual problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/th>Strategy<\/th>RevOps Process<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Focus<\/strong><\/td>How the entire revenue system should work<\/td>How specific work gets done<\/td><\/tr>
Scope<\/strong><\/td>Cross-functional and business-wide<\/td>Workflow-specific<\/td><\/tr>
Example<\/strong><\/td>Define what qualifies a lead and who owns it across teams<\/td>Route a qualified lead from marketing to SDR within 4 hours<\/td><\/tr>
Timeframe<\/strong><\/td>Ongoing, reviewed quarterly<\/td>Defined once, updated when the process breaks<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Strategy decides the system. Process implements specific workflows. A team can have detailed processes for lead routing and deal stages and still have inconsistent pipeline if nothing connects them into a coherent system with shared definitions and metrics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The same distinction applies to automation, where most teams start and where progress often stalls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How Does Automation Fit Into a RevOps Strategy?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Automation is a common starting point. A team automates lead routing and expects pipeline to stabilize. It often does not, because automation executes a process the system must define first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Strategy:<\/strong> Defines how the system should work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

RevOps process:<\/strong> Translates strategy into documented workflows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

RevOps automation:<\/strong> Executes repeatable parts at volume.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When teams start with automation before strategy, they automate their existing mess and produce wrong results faster.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How a RevOps Strategy Becomes a Pipeline Operating System<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Here is the framework running as a connected sequence for a mid-market SaaS company targeting operations leaders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>ICP Is Defined at the Account Level<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The team agrees on a precise ICP: operations leaders at B2B SaaS companies with 50 to 500 employees showing hiring signals. This definition filters every subsequent targeting and outreach decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Target Accounts Are Scored by Fit and Signal<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Accounts matching the ICP are scored by firmographic fit and intent signals. Score determines the outreach tier and messaging depth each account receives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Contacts Are Identified and Enriched Before Outreach Begins<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Two to three contacts per account are mapped and enriched automatically. Reps skip manual research before each sequence starts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Outreach Is Tiered by Account Priority<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Tier 1 accounts receive a personalized multi-touch sequence. Tier 2 gets a shorter automated sequence. Messaging derives from the ICP definition, not individual rep style.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>All Activity Logs to CRM Without Manual Input<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Every call, email reply, and meeting syncs to the CRM automatically. Stages advance on defined criteria, not rep judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Pipeline Is Reviewed Against Shared Metrics Weekly<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Leadership reviews pipeline from a shared dashboard covering coverage, conversion rates, and accounts at risk. No manual consolidation needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Win and Loss Data Feeds Back Into the ICP Definition<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Win rate, loss reasons, and deal velocity by ICP tier are reviewed at quarter end. ICP and messaging update based on what closed, so the system improves from within.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Build<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>When Does a B2B Team Actually Need a RevOps Strategy?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Not every team needs a full RevOps function from day one. Five signals suggest the problem is systemic rather than isolated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Is Pipeline Inconsistent Quarter Over Quarter?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pipeline that spikes and collapses without explanation points to a structural problem, usually ICP definition, data quality, or process documentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Do Marketing and Sales Define Qualified Leads Differently?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When marketing counts MQLs as success and sales rejects half of them, both teams are on different ICP definitions. No amount of coordination fixes a definitional disagreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Is CRM Data Unreliable or Incomplete?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When reps build their own lists because they do not trust the CRM, the pipeline view is incomplete. This is a data standards problem, not a technology one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Are Handoffs Between Teams Manual and Inconsistent?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When leads fall through the gap between marketing and sales with no SLA, the issue is process design. Documented workflows make handoffs enforceable rather than dependent on individual diligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Can Leadership Read Pipeline Without Pulling Multiple Reports?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When the pipeline number requires consolidating from multiple tools, the measurement layer is broken. A shared reporting foundation makes the pipeline readable in real time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When several of these signals appear together, the problem is likely structural rather than isolated. Understanding why many attempts fall short is what separates a functional system from a repeated investment that produces minimal results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Why Do Most RevOps Strategies Still Fail?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Many RevOps implementations fall short because of predictable mistakes in sequencing and scope. These six failure patterns tend to undermine the effort. If your team needs external help to address these gaps, see our guide to revenue operations consulting firms<\/a> and how they differ in scope, delivery model, and execution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How Starting With Tools Before Process Derails RevOps<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Purchasing a new platform before documenting existing workflows automates the current mess. Define process before automation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Why RevOps Fails When Ownership Stays Siloed<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When RevOps sits only in ops without cross-functional buy-in, the definitions it creates get ignored. Shared ownership requires commitment from sales and marketing leadership, not just shared dashboard visibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How Unreliable Data Undermines the Whole System<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A system built on incomplete or outdated data produces wrong targeting at scale. Data quality is a prerequisite for everything else, not a cleanup project to schedule after rollout.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Why Tracking Too Many Metrics Kills RevOps Focus<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Tracking 25 metrics means optimizing for none of them. Focus on five to eight that predict revenue outcomes and review them together weekly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How Skipping Feedback Loops Stalls RevOps Progress<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Without a structured review of win and loss data, the same ICP assumptions and messaging decisions repeat indefinitely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Why Trying to Build Everything at Once Delays Results<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Build a minimum viable system, run it for 60 days, and improve from there. Waiting for a complete build means the organization benefits from nothing while the project stalls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The sequence for addressing these failure modes starts with the same fundamentals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How to Build a RevOps Strategy: A 10-Step Framework<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Each step builds on the previous one. Skipping or reordering them is a common reason RevOps implementations stall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 1: Define ICP With Precision<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Specify company size, industry, technology used, growth signals, and buyer role. This definition must be agreed across marketing, sales, and CS before anything else is built on top of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 2: Audit Current Data Against That ICP<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pull CRM records and measure how many match the ICP. Identifying the gap now prevents scoring and enrichment layers from inheriting those same problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 3: Map the Revenue Process End to End<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Document every stage from first marketing touch to renewal. Identify where handoffs occur, where deals stall, and where ownership is ambiguous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 4: Establish Shared Pipeline Metrics<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Define five to eight metrics every team reports against together: pipeline coverage, stage conversion, time in stage, and win rate by ICP tier. Shared metrics make weekly reviews productive rather than political.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 5: Document Every Workflow and Handoff<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For each major transition, define who owns it, what triggers the next step, and what SLA applies. Documentation in a shared system gets enforced. Documentation in memory does not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 6: Introduce Automation Where It Removes Friction<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Start with high-volume, low-ambiguity tasks: lead routing, follow-up sequences, and stage progression triggers. Do not automate anything that has not been documented first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 7: Integrate the Tech Stack Around the CRM<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Every tool that touches the revenue cycle should push data into the CRM. Integrations that create parallel records reintroduce the fragmentation the system was built to eliminate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 8: Run a Weekly Pipeline Review<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Review pipeline coverage, conversion rates, and at-risk accounts weekly using the shared metrics layer. This review is only reliable once Steps 2 and 7 are in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 9: Build a Structured Feedback Loop<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Schedule a quarterly review of win and loss data together. Assign one owner to translate findings into ICP, messaging, and process updates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Step 10: Iterate in 60-Day Cycles<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Run the system for 60 days, measure what changed, and improve what shows gaps. Expecting a complete system on the first attempt delays results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The right tooling makes each step easier to execute at scale. Here is what a connected RevOps tech stack needs to include.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Build<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>What Tools Do RevOps Teams Actually Need?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Many RevOps tech stacks underperform not because a tool is missing but because the tools do not connect. The question is not which tools to buy, but how they integrate with the CRM at the center of the system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>CRM: The System of Record for All Revenue Activity<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The CRM is the data model everything else is built on. If reps are not logging activity consistently, the pipeline view is incomplete and the shared metrics layer has no reliable input.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Data and Enrichment: Keeping Account and Contact Records Accurate<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pintel.ai is built as a RevOps<\/a> execution platform that connects ICP targeting, contact intelligence, and account enrichment into one layer that syncs directly to the CRM. Teams use it to run account scoring, enrichment, and pipeline-connected data workflows<\/a> without building separate sync processes between tools.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Sales Engagement: Managing Sequences and Activity at Scale<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Sales engagement platforms manage multi-touch outreach, track activity at the account level, and sync touchpoints back to the CRM. Without one, follow-up consistency depends on rep behavior rather than a defined execution standard<\/a> that runs across the team at volume.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Revenue Intelligence: Understanding Deal Health Before the Quarter Ends<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Revenue intelligence tools surface deal risks and improve forecast accuracy by analyzing patterns across open opportunities. Without one, deal health relies on rep self-reporting, which often lags actual progression by the time leadership reviews it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Analytics and BI: Converting CRM Data Into Pipeline Visibility<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Analytics tools turn raw CRM data into the pipeline and conversion reports the weekly review depends on. Without a BI layer, leadership builds reports manually from stale data, and the account prioritization<\/a> visibility the system creates is only as good as what the reporting layer shows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The key rule for every tool in this stack: data must flow into the CRM, not away from it. Any tool that creates parallel records fragments the system and reintroduces the data problems the structure was built to eliminate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>RevOps Strategy Checklist: Eight Questions to Test Your System<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A functioning revenue system must answer each of these with a clear yes. Any no identifies the starting point for the next improvement cycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Do All Teams Use the Same ICP Definition?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If marketing, sales, and CS describe the ideal customer differently, every downstream pipeline decision is built on competing assumptions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Is the CRM the Single Source of Truth for All Pipeline Activity?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Reps maintaining separate tracking sheets or tools that do not sync to the CRM produce an incomplete pipeline view and unreliable forecasts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Are Workflows Documented and Accessible Beyond the Ops Team?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Documentation that lives only inside ops is invisible to the reps who execute it and cannot be enforced or improved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Are Pipeline Metrics Reviewed Together Across Teams Weekly?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Shared accountability requires a shared data source and weekly reviews where every team looks at the same metrics against agreed definitions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Are SLAs Defined for Every Major Handoff?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Without a defined time window and escalation path at each transition, handoffs are aspirational rather than enforceable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Is Contact and Account Data Enriched on a Regular Cadence?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A documented enrichment cadence keeps records current before outreach is built on them, not after bounce rates confirm the decay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Can Leadership Pull a Reliable Pipeline Forecast Without Manual Consolidation?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Forecast reliability requires one data source with consistent input standards. Pulling from multiple tools means the number is assembled, not measured.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Does Win and Loss Data Feed Back Into ICP and Messaging?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Without deal outcomes reaching the teams generating pipeline, the same targeting and messaging decisions repeat regardless of what close data shows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Build<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Frequently Asked Questions<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>What is a RevOps strategy?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A RevOps strategy is a documented system that aligns marketing, sales, and customer success around consistent, repeatable revenue. It covers ICP definition, data reliability, process design, execution, measurement, and feedback loops.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>What should a complete RevOps strategy include?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A complete RevOps strategy should connect six components: ICP, data, process, execution, measurement, and feedback<\/strong>. These components work together to define who to target, how revenue processes should work, how teams execute them, how performance is measured, and how results improve the system over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How is AI used in RevOps?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

AI can help RevOps teams<\/a> automate lead routing, enrich CRM records, score accounts, identify pipeline risks, and surface revenue signals for sales and marketing teams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>What is the difference between a RevOps strategy and a RevOps process?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A RevOps strategy defines how the overall revenue system should work across teams. A RevOps process defines how specific workflows get executed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, the strategy may define what qualifies a lead and who owns it, while the process defines how that qualified lead is routed from marketing to sales.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Do you need a RevOps agency to implement your strategy?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Not always. Internal teams can manage RevOps themselves, but a RevOps agency<\/a> can provide specialized expertise when the strategy or implementation becomes complex. A RevOps consultancy<\/a> can also help with strategy, process improvement, and broader revenue operations support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>How do you measure RevOps performance?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

RevOps performance can be measured using metrics such as stage conversion rates, time in stage, win rate by ICP tier, pipeline coverage, and forecast accuracy<\/strong>. The most useful metrics are shared across revenue teams and reviewed consistently to identify where the system is working or breaking down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>When should a B2B company invest in RevOps?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A B2B company should consider investing in RevOps when pipeline is inconsistent, teams use different definitions of qualified leads, CRM data is unreliable, handoffs are manual or inconsistent, or leadership spends too much time consolidating reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When several of these problems occur together, the issue is likely structural rather than an isolated team or process problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Should you build a RevOps team or use a RevOps execution partner?<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The right approach depends on your team’s size, technical requirements, and RevOps maturity. An internal team provides dedicated ownership, while a RevOps execution partner can provide specialized expertise and technical execution without requiring a full in house team.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For companies that need help implementing their RevOps strategy, an execution partner can support areas such as data, workflows, automation, and CRM connected processes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A B2B team finishes Q3 with a pipeline miss. Not because the team did not put…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":5736,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[156],"tags":[204,206,116],"class_list":["post-1957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-revops-crm","tag-ai-in-revops","tag-revops-strategy","tag-revops-workflow"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1957"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5858,"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1957\/revisions\/5858"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5736"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pintel.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}